Avoid These 5 Common Corporate Governance Errors
- Jeri Brown
- Apr 25
- 7 min read

The strength of a company’s governance often determines how well it can navigate complexity, manage risk, and deliver long-term value. Good corporate governance is essentially the system that keeps a company on track, ensuring decisions are made responsibly, leadership is held to account, and everyone understands their role in driving the business forward. It’s not just about ticking compliance boxes; it’s about creating clarity around who’s responsible for what, how risks are managed, and how the organisation stays aligned with its purpose.
Yet despite well-intentioned policies and procedures, governance mistakes remain all too common and often costly. This is in part because corporate governance isn’t static; it’s a living framework that needs to evolve as your organisation grows. As businesses face rising regulatory scrutiny, stakeholder activism, and public expectations, the margin for governance error is shrinking. What may have been acceptable five years ago could now pose serious risks.
In this guide, we unpack the top five corporate governance mistakes and explore why they happen, what they cost, and how you can avoid them with practical tools, strategies, and boardroom culture shifts. For executives, board members, and company secretaries, understanding these pitfalls is the first step in creating structures that truly support accountability, integrity, and long-term performance. In other words, the first step toward using corporate governance to your organisation’s advantage.
What Are the Top 5 Corporate Governance Mistakes?
While governance challenges vary by sector and size, some governance mistakes surface time and again across both listed and private companies. These issues often have a cascading effect on decision-making, risk oversight, and reputational resilience.
Here are the five most common governance mistakes:
Lack of board independence: When board members are not truly independent, it limits effective oversight and increases the risk of conflicts of interest. Without objective, diverse perspectives, boards may struggle to challenge management decisions or uphold the best interests of all stakeholders.
Poor succession planning: Without clear plans for leadership transitions, organisations can face instability at exactly the moment they need clarity and confidence. We've all seen scenarios where a sudden leadership change leaves stakeholders uncertain and the business scrambling to respond, often at the expense of momentum and market confidence.
Inadequate risk oversight: From financial to reputational, failing to identify or manage risks undermines strategic decision-making. In some sectors, such as financial services or health, this can lead to direct regulatory penalties.
Misaligned executive compensation: When pay packages aren’t clearly linked to performance or long-term goals, it can raise concerns among shareholders and other stakeholders. It’s not uncommon for generous bonuses or exit packages to attract scrutiny, especially when a company is underperforming or facing reputational challenges.
Ineffective stakeholder communication: When boards and leadership don’t communicate clearly and consistently with key stakeholders such as shareholders, employees, or regulators, it can quickly erode trust. This often plays out in situations where messaging is vague, reactive, or delayed. In recent years, several firms have faced backlash for unclear disclosures around financial performance, governance decisions, or ESG commitments.
Each of these errors weakens the governance framework and can contribute to deeper organisational issues over time.
Why Do Companies Struggle with Governance Compliance?
As mentioned, corporate governance compliance is not just a regulatory obligation—it’s a dynamic and evolving responsibility. Yet many companies struggle to meet even baseline requirements.
There are several reasons for this:
Rapid growth without governance maturity: Fast-growing businesses may outpace their structures and processes. For example, many tech start-ups discover too late that their governance policies haven’t scaled with the business.
Overreliance on informal practices: Relying too heavily on unwritten rules or longstanding norms can lead to governance blind spots. This is common in family-owned firms or legacy organisations.
Complex regulatory environments: Especially in multinational organisations, differing requirements across jurisdictions can create compliance confusion. Cross-border boards may need clarity on which regulatory standards apply.
Lack of board diversity or expertise: A board without varied perspectives or the right skills may fail to identify or respond to emerging issues. Skills audits are a helpful tool, but are not always conducted regularly.
Companies that approach governance as a box-ticking exercise rather than a value-driving process are more likely to fall into non-compliance. This has been echoed in guidance published by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), which emphasises that meaningful application of the UK Corporate Governance Code is just as important as formal compliance.
What Are the 4 P’s of Corporate Governance?
The "4 P’s" framework is a useful lens through which to understand both corporate governance best practices and where organisations commonly go wrong. They are:
People: The effectiveness, independence, and integrity of board members, executives, and senior leadership. An imbalance in skills or a lack of succession planning often stems from issues under this pillar.
Purpose: The alignment between organisational goals, stakeholder interests, and long-term sustainability. For example, failing to define a company’s ESG commitments in relation to its strategy is a purpose misalignment.
Process: The policies, procedures, and internal controls that ensure compliance and transparency. Outdated risk frameworks or inconsistent reporting practices often fall under this.
Performance: The measurement of outcomes, including financial, operational, and ethical benchmarks. Governance must be tied to measurable goals, whether that’s reducing turnover, improving ROI, or enhancing stakeholder feedback.
Neglecting any one of the four P’s opens the door to common governance issues. For example, lack of diversity and expertise (People), absence of ESG alignment (Purpose), poor record-keeping or audit trails (Process), or short-termism (Performance).
To build an effective governance framework, boards must ensure these four dimensions are continuously reviewed, refined, and integrated across the business.
Common Consequences of Poor Corporate Governance
Governance issues don’t stay hidden for long. Whether they are revealed as compliance breaches, shareholder pushback, or public scandal, the consequences of governance failure can be severe.
Loss of investor confidence: Governance scandals are among the top reasons for investor divestment, especially in public companies and in emerging markets. A fundamental lack of transparency and trust often results in investors allocating capital away from companies with weak governance.
Reputational damage: A governance failure often attracts media and regulatory scrutiny, which can erode brand value. This erosion can be long-lasting, especially when public trust is tied to ethical or environmental standards.
Financial penalties: Breaches of reporting or regulatory requirements can result in significant fines or legal costs. Regulators have become increasingly strict about disclosure failures and inaccurate reporting, making financial consequences more common and more costly.
Internal disruption: Poor governance often leads to internal distrust, executive churn, and operational inefficiency. This can be particularly destabilising in sectors where continuity and culture are critical, such as education, healthcare or the charity sector.
While exact impacts vary by industry, gaps in governance are consistently associated with underperformance over time. Multiple studies have shown that companies with weak governance frameworks are more likely to face volatility, regulatory intervention, and loss of market position. Essentially, poor governance is bad for business.
How to Strengthen Your Corporate Governance Strategy
To address governance issues effectively, companies need more than surface-level fixes. Strengthening governance requires an integrated approach across policy, culture, and oversight.
Start by asking:
Are your governance structures clear, documented, and fit for purpose?
Is your board evaluating its own performance and that of key committees?
Do internal controls support both compliance and strategic agility?
Then take action:
Conduct regular board evaluations
Update and clarify governance policies
Embed ESG and sustainability into decision-making
Encourage whistleblowing and ethical reporting frameworks
Improve board information quality and timeliness
Don’t overlook the human side of governance either. Ensuring boardroom dynamics encourage challenge and collaboration is just as important as getting the paperwork right.
Best Practices to Avoid Common Governance Errors
Learning from others' mistakes is one of the most cost-effective ways to improve governance. The following practices are widely regarded as essential to avoiding common governance errors:
Separate the roles of Chair and CEO: This ensures balanced power and independent oversight.
Set term limits for board members: Avoid groupthink and bring fresh perspectives to the table.
Maintain up-to-date risk registers: Dynamic risk management should reflect evolving priorities.
Disclose governance practices transparently: Regular reporting builds stakeholder trust.
Use board portals and digital tools: Secure platforms improve record-keeping and communication.
Incorporating these practices serves to create a culture that prioritises clarity, accountability, and responsiveness. Best practices evolve over time, so boards should benchmark regularly against updated guidance from governance bodies like the Institute of Directors and the National Association of Corporate Directors.
The Role of the Board in Maintaining Governance Standards
Ultimately, the board is the cornerstone of good governance. Its composition, conduct, and commitment set the tone from the top.
The board's core governance responsibilities include:
Approving and overseeing strategic plans
Appointing, evaluating, and compensating senior executives
Ensuring accurate financial reporting and audit compliance
Overseeing major risks and regulatory obligations
Championing ethical standards and values
An engaged board is one that not only asks tough questions but also ensures the answers lead to real action. That means reviewing agendas to focus on what matters most, avoiding over-delegation, and setting clear performance expectations for both executives and themselves.
Boards must strike a balance between guidance and oversight, supporting management while holding it accountable. Regular board training, skills audits, and stakeholder engagement can strengthen their governance role.
How Training Improves Governance Accountability
One of the most underestimated ways to improve governance is through continuous education. Governance training equips directors, executives, and governance professionals with the tools they need to stay effective in a changing landscape.
Training has the added benefit of levelling the playing field—bringing newer or less experienced directors up to speed and aligning everyone around shared values.
Well-designed training can:
Improve understanding of legal and fiduciary duties
Clarify emerging regulatory trends
Support ethical decision-making in complex situations
Foster a shared governance language among leadership
The Financial Reporting Council and other regulatory bodies increasingly advocate for governance development programmes tailored to sector, size, and maturity level. Training should not be limited to onboarding. Annual refreshers, sector-specific briefings, and peer learning sessions can help institutionalise good governance habits.
Corporate governance problems often stem not from bad intentions but from blind spots, outdated practices, or competing priorities. But the risks are too great to ignore. When corporate governance fails, it can weaken investor confidence, damage reputation, and undermine long-term goals.
The good news? These issues are preventable. By identifying common corporate governance failures and addressing them through proactive planning, education, and implementation of corporate governance best practices, organisations can future-proof themselves.
For more guidance on good corporate governance or to speak with an expert about strengthening your approach, contact Sage Governance. Because when corporate governance is done right, it doesn’t just protect the organisation—it fuels its growth, accountability, and sustainability.